Homework references
This article summarises research evidence relevant to homework, learning outcomes, cognitive load, and learner variability. It supports the view that homework effectiveness is conditional rather than universal.
Meta-analyses of homework effectiveness
Cooper et al. (2006)
Cooper, Robinson, and Patall reviewed research published between 1987 and 2003 and found no meaningful relationship between homework and academic achievement in primary education, and only small positive associations in secondary education.[1]
The authors reported substantial variation depending on task type, study design, and learner age.
Hattie (2009; 2012)
John Hattie's synthesis of meta-analyses reported an average homework effect size of approximately 0.29, with substantially lower effects in primary education.[2] Hattie characterised homework as having a modest impact relative to other educational interventions.
Cognitive load theory
Cognitive Load Theory proposes that learning depends on limited working-memory capacity and that excessive cognitive demands impair learning.[3] Practice that exceeds available capacity is unlikely to improve learning outcomes.
Neurodevelopmental research
Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder
Research on ADHD indicates that sustained performance requires increased regulatory effort, leading to fatigue and depletion despite adequate output.[4]
Autism and attention
Monotropism theory describes autistic cognition as involving intense, narrow focus that is efficient but resource-intensive, with increased costs associated with task-switching and extended demands.[5]
Dyslexia
Research on dyslexia demonstrates that reading and written output require greater cognitive effort, meaning output volume and speed are weak indicators of understanding.[6]
Stress, fatigue, and recovery
The concept of allostatic load describes the cumulative physiological and cognitive cost of sustained effort under stress.[7] Recovery time is considered important for maintaining cognitive function and learning readiness.
Homework and inequality
The OECD has reported that homework can exacerbate socio-economic inequalities and that time spent on homework is a weak predictor of academic performance compared with other factors.[8]
Conclusion
Across educational psychology, cognitive science, and neurodevelopmental research, no evidence establishes homework as inherently necessary or universally beneficial. Research indicates that its effectiveness depends on learner capacity, task design, and context.
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedCooper2006 - ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedHattie2009 - ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedSweller2011 - ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedBarkley2015 - ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedMurray2005 - ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedSnowling2000 - ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedMcEwen1998 - ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedOECD2014