View source for WAIS Domain Structure and Internal Discrepancy


== WAIS Domain Structure and Internal Discrepancy ==
This page explains how the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) provides structured, standardised evidence of internal cognitive differences across distinct domains.

WAIS does not measure a single, uniform intelligence. It separates cognitive functioning into multiple domains, including:

Verbal Comprehension (VCI)

Perceptual Reasoning (PRI)

Working Memory (WMI)

Processing Speed (PSI)

Each domain is standardised independently. This allows meaningful comparison between domains within the same individual.

Where substantial differences exist between domains, these differences are measurable rather than speculative.

=== Domain separation ===
WAIS distinguishes between reasoning-dominant domains (such as Verbal Comprehension and Perceptual Reasoning) and efficiency-dominant domains (such as Working Memory and Processing Speed).

Because each domain has its own population distribution, large internal discrepancies can be identified even where the overall Full Scale IQ (FSIQ) appears average.

In such cases, an overall average score may conceal both high-level reasoning strengths and significant efficiency constraints.

=== Composite discrepancies (GAI and CPI) ===
Some WAIS frameworks distinguish between:

General Ability Index (GAI) – reasoning-weighted composite

Cognitive Proficiency Index (CPI) – efficiency-weighted composite

Where large differences exist between GAI and CPI, this indicates internal cognitive asymmetry. These discrepancies are commonly observed in neurodevelopmental conditions such as dyslexia and ADHD.

Such divergence does not imply global impairment. It demonstrates uneven cognitive architecture.

=== Further technical illustration ===
For illustrative modelling of internal domain divergence, see [[Technical Appendix: Illustrative Models of Uneven Cognitive Asymmetry]].

=== Why WAIS is relevant in this framework ===
WAIS is not the only way to conceptualise uneven cognitive profiles. However, it is one of the most widely recognised, standardised, and professionally accepted tools available for separating cognitive domains.

It therefore provides structured empirical support for distinguishing:

intrinsic reasoning capacity

constraints on expression under load

This supports the distinction between capacity and expression described elsewhere in this section.

=== Limits of WAIS ===
WAIS is an indicator, not a complete description of cognitive functioning.

It does not:

capture all aspects of cognition

define identity or potential

explain environmental or contextual factors

operate independently of interpretation

WAIS provides structured evidence of internal variation. It does not exhaust the concept of uneven cognitive profiles.

Its relevance lies in making domain-level differences measurable and visible within a recognised assessment framework.

=== Relationship to the wider framework ===
The distinction between capacity and expression, the failure of generic assessment under load, and the limits of cognitive adjustability all derive logically from the domain separation visible within WAIS.

WAIS therefore functions as empirical grounding for the broader structural argument concerning assessment validity.

=== Related pages ===
[[Uneven Cognitive Profiles and Assessment Validity]]

[[Uneven cognitive profiles explained|Uneven Cognitive Profiles Explained]]

[[Cognitive Capacity, Expression, and Compensability]]

[[Why Generic Assessment Fails with Uneven Cognitive Profiles]]

[[Limits of cognitive adjustability|Limits of Cognitive Adjustability]]

[[Structured Cognitive Evidence and Uneven Profiles]]