Ddaq100 - Revision history

PeteTyerman at 10:34, 16 November 2025

2025-11-16T10:34:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:34, 16 November 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
			Return to main navigation:* [[Main Page\|Main page]]

	== DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION AWARENESS QUESTIONNAIRE (DDAQ) DRAFT EARLY FINDINGS (n=100) ==		== DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION AWARENESS QUESTIONNAIRE (DDAQ) DRAFT EARLY FINDINGS (n=100) ==

PeteTyerman: corrections

2025-04-08T18:53:23Z

corrections

Show changes

PeteTyerman at 09:10, 5 April 2025

2025-04-05T09:10:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:10, 5 April 2025
Line 120:		Line 120:
	[[File:Pilotimg4.png\|thumb\|centre\|upright=10\|Retrospective pre training ratings ]]		[[File:Pilotimg4.png\|thumb\|centre\|upright=10\|Retrospective pre training ratings ]]

	[[File:Pilotimg5.png\|thumb\|centre\|Retrospective pre training ratings \|~~300x300px~~]]		[[File:Pilotimg5.png\|thumb\|centre\|Retrospective pre training ratings \|600x600px]]

PeteTyerman at 09:08, 5 April 2025

2025-04-05T09:08:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:08, 5 April 2025
Line 120:		Line 120:
	[[File:Pilotimg4.png\|thumb\|centre\|upright=10\|Retrospective pre training ratings ]]		[[File:Pilotimg4.png\|thumb\|centre\|upright=10\|Retrospective pre training ratings ]]

	[[File:Pilotimg5.png\|thumb\|centre\|Retrospective pre training ratings \|~~152x152px~~]]		[[File:Pilotimg5.png\|thumb\|centre\|Retrospective pre training ratings \|300x300px]]

PeteTyerman at 09:07, 5 April 2025

2025-04-05T09:07:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:07, 5 April 2025
Line 120:		Line 120:
	[[File:Pilotimg4.png\|thumb\|centre\|upright=10\|Retrospective pre training ratings ]]		[[File:Pilotimg4.png\|thumb\|centre\|upright=10\|Retrospective pre training ratings ]]

	[[File:Pilotimg5.png\|thumb\|centre~~\|upright=5~~\|Retrospective pre training ratings ]]		[[File:Pilotimg5.png\|thumb\|centre\|Retrospective pre training ratings \|152x152px]]

PeteTyerman: uopdate img

2025-04-05T09:04:27Z

uopdate img

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:04, 5 April 2025
Line 34:		Line 34:
	'''''Awareness on individual DDAQ items ranged from a low of just 23% to a high of 97%, with 11/30 items known by under 50% of healthcare staff.''''' These items mainly relate to the definition of disability and the duty to make reasonable adjustments:		'''''Awareness on individual DDAQ items ranged from a low of just 23% to a high of 97%, with 11/30 items known by under 50% of healthcare staff.''''' These items mainly relate to the definition of disability and the duty to make reasonable adjustments:

	~~[[File:Pilotimg5.png\|thumb\|centre\|upright=20\|self rating pre and post training ]]~~

	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable"
Line 119:		Line 119:
	The increase in awareness is illustrated below in the distribution of self-ratings for retrospective pre-DDAQ completion and post-DDAQ training.		The increase in awareness is illustrated below in the distribution of self-ratings for retrospective pre-DDAQ completion and post-DDAQ training.
	[[File:Pilotimg4.png\|thumb\|centre\|upright=10\|Retrospective pre training ratings ]]		[[File:Pilotimg4.png\|thumb\|centre\|upright=10\|Retrospective pre training ratings ]]

			[[File:Pilotimg5.png\|thumb\|centre\|upright=5\|Retrospective pre training ratings ]]

PeteTyerman at 08:31, 5 April 2025

2025-04-05T08:31:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:31, 5 April 2025
Line 28:		Line 28:
	As illustrated in the figure below, '''''the target score of 27-30 was achieved by just 11% of respondents, with 38% scoring 50% or less and 13% scoring 33% or less.''''' Scores are well spread with a relatively flat and wide peak across scores 11-22. Whilst those with more experience might be expected to have more awareness no significant relationship with years of practice was found (Spearman’s rho =0.17, n.s.).		As illustrated in the figure below, '''''the target score of 27-30 was achieved by just 11% of respondents, with 38% scoring 50% or less and 13% scoring 33% or less.''''' Scores are well spread with a relatively flat and wide peak across scores 11-22. Whilst those with more experience might be expected to have more awareness no significant relationship with years of practice was found (Spearman’s rho =0.17, n.s.).

	[[File:Pilotimg3.png\|thumb\|Frequency distribution]]		[[File:Pilotimg3.png\|thumb\|centre\|upright=20\|Frequency distribution]]

	'''Awareness on individual DDAQ items'''		'''Awareness on individual DDAQ items'''

	'''''Awareness on individual DDAQ items ranged from a low of just 23% to a high of 97%, with 11/30 items known by under 50% of healthcare staff.''''' These items mainly relate to the definition of disability and the duty to make reasonable adjustments:		'''''Awareness on individual DDAQ items ranged from a low of just 23% to a high of 97%, with 11/30 items known by under 50% of healthcare staff.''''' These items mainly relate to the definition of disability and the duty to make reasonable adjustments:

			[[File:Pilotimg5.png\|thumb\|centre\|upright=20\|self rating pre and post training ]]

	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable"
Line 116:		Line 118:

	The increase in awareness is illustrated below in the distribution of self-ratings for retrospective pre-DDAQ completion and post-DDAQ training.		The increase in awareness is illustrated below in the distribution of self-ratings for retrospective pre-DDAQ completion and post-DDAQ training.
			[[File:Pilotimg4.png\|thumb\|centre\|upright=10\|Retrospective pre training ratings ]]



Line 122:		Line 125:

	The increased awareness is marked for the low scorers. Those with a rating of 5 or below reduced from 42 % to 9% and those rating 4 or below reduced from 25% to just 1% (There are also less scores of 5-6 and more at 7-10.) '''''The mean rise of 3.13 for the 42% scoring 5 or below and 3.36 for the 25% scoring 4 and below represent increases over pre-DDAQ training ratings of 89% and 109% respectively. ''''' Given the particularly marked increase for the lower scorers mean, ratings for staff with lower awareness (i.e. scoring 5 or below) are included in the Figure below, along with all 100 respondents and the 91 without the likely ceiling effect.		The increased awareness is marked for the low scorers. Those with a rating of 5 or below reduced from 42 % to 9% and those rating 4 or below reduced from 25% to just 1% (There are also less scores of 5-6 and more at 7-10.) '''''The mean rise of 3.13 for the 42% scoring 5 or below and 3.36 for the 25% scoring 4 and below represent increases over pre-DDAQ training ratings of 89% and 109% respectively. ''''' Given the particularly marked increase for the lower scorers mean, ratings for staff with lower awareness (i.e. scoring 5 or below) are included in the Figure below, along with all 100 respondents and the 91 without the likely ceiling effect.

			[[File:Pilotimg6.png\|thumb\|centre\|upright=20\|self-rating pre & post traning]]

PeteTyerman: addeded images

2025-04-05T08:18:29Z

addeded images

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:18, 5 April 2025
Line 27:		Line 27:

	As illustrated in the figure below, '''''the target score of 27-30 was achieved by just 11% of respondents, with 38% scoring 50% or less and 13% scoring 33% or less.''''' Scores are well spread with a relatively flat and wide peak across scores 11-22. Whilst those with more experience might be expected to have more awareness no significant relationship with years of practice was found (Spearman’s rho =0.17, n.s.).		As illustrated in the figure below, '''''the target score of 27-30 was achieved by just 11% of respondents, with 38% scoring 50% or less and 13% scoring 33% or less.''''' Scores are well spread with a relatively flat and wide peak across scores 11-22. Whilst those with more experience might be expected to have more awareness no significant relationship with years of practice was found (Spearman’s rho =0.17, n.s.).

			[[File:Pilotimg3.png\|thumb\|Frequency distribution]]

	'''Awareness on individual DDAQ items'''		'''Awareness on individual DDAQ items'''
Line 114:		Line 116:

	The increase in awareness is illustrated below in the distribution of self-ratings for retrospective pre-DDAQ completion and post-DDAQ training.		The increase in awareness is illustrated below in the distribution of self-ratings for retrospective pre-DDAQ completion and post-DDAQ training.

PeteTyerman at 22:03, 4 April 2025

2025-04-04T22:03:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:03, 4 April 2025
Line 15:		Line 15:

	As illustrated in the Figure below, this is an experienced staff group: 24% > 20 yrs.; 63% > 10 yrs. and 76% > 5 yrs. Only 24% have less than 5 yrs. experience.		As illustrated in the Figure below, this is an experienced staff group: 24% > 20 yrs.; 63% > 10 yrs. and 76% > 5 yrs. Only 24% have less than 5 yrs. experience.
			[[File:Pilotimg2.png\|thumb\|centre\|upright=20\|Staff group]]

PeteTyerman at 22:01, 4 April 2025

2025-04-04T22:01:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:01, 4 April 2025
Line 10:		Line 10:


	[[File:Pilotimg1.png\|thumb\|~~left~~\|Profession/role]]		[[File:Pilotimg1.png\|thumb\|centre\|upright=20\|Profession/role]]



	As illustrated in the Figure below, this is an experienced staff group: 24% > 20 yrs.; 63% > 10 yrs. and 76% > 5 yrs. Only 24% have less than 5 yrs. experience.		As illustrated in the Figure below, this is an experienced staff group: 24% > 20 yrs.; 63% > 10 yrs. and 76% > 5 yrs. Only 24% have less than 5 yrs. experience.