MediaWiki API result
This is the HTML representation of the JSON format. HTML is good for debugging, but is unsuitable for application use.
Specify the format parameter to change the output format. To see the non-HTML representation of the JSON format, set format=json.
See the complete documentation, or the API help for more information.
{
"batchcomplete": "",
"continue": {
"lecontinue": "20260203115330|112",
"continue": "-||"
},
"query": {
"logevents": [
{
"logid": 122,
"ns": 0,
"title": "A structured framework to support assessment of reasonable adjustments under Section 20 of the Equality Act 2010.",
"pageid": 94,
"logpage": 94,
"revid": 401,
"params": {},
"type": "create",
"action": "create",
"user": "PeteTyerman",
"timestamp": "2026-02-19T09:06:55Z",
"comment": "Created page with \"'''Equality Act 2010 \u2013 Section 20''' '''Operational Framework for Reasonable Adjustments''' The Equality Act 2010 imposes a positive duty on employers to make reasonable adjustments where workplace arrangements place a disabled employee at a substantial disadvantage. This document provides a structured, practical framework to assist employers in complying with that duty in day-to-day decision-making. It reflects the purpose of the Act \u2014 namely, to prevent and remo...\""
},
{
"logid": 121,
"ns": 0,
"title": "Base cases: uneven cognitive profiles and assessment failure",
"pageid": 93,
"logpage": 93,
"revid": 396,
"params": {},
"type": "create",
"action": "create",
"user": "PeteTyerman",
"timestamp": "2026-02-10T11:33:49Z",
"comment": "Created page with \" == Base Cases: Uneven Cognitive Profiles and Assessment Failure == This page presents real-world examples demonstrating recurring structural failure in assessment and decision-making where uneven cognitive profiles are not properly recognised or accommodated. All cases set out here are based on real events, including decided tribunal or court cases, settled claims, and documented institutional decisions. Where necessary, identifying details have been anonymised. The pu...\""
},
{
"logid": 120,
"ns": 0,
"title": "Applied contexts and systemic consequences",
"pageid": 92,
"logpage": 92,
"revid": 383,
"params": {},
"type": "create",
"action": "create",
"user": "PeteTyerman",
"timestamp": "2026-02-10T10:46:36Z",
"comment": "Created page with \"== Applied Contexts and Systemic Consequences == This page brings together the practical implications of uneven cognitive profiles across education, employment, and decision-making systems, and explains how structural misinterpretation accumulates over time. The domain separation visible in structured cognitive assessment demonstrates that reasoning capacity and efficiency under load may diverge significantly within the same individual. Where systems rely on aggregated...\""
},
{
"logid": 119,
"ns": 0,
"title": "Structured Cognitive Evidence and Uneven Profiles",
"pageid": 91,
"logpage": 91,
"revid": 380,
"params": {},
"type": "create",
"action": "create",
"user": "PeteTyerman",
"timestamp": "2026-02-10T10:41:02Z",
"comment": "Created page with \"== Structured Cognitive Evidence and Uneven Profiles == This page explains how structured cognitive assessment provides empirical support for identifying uneven cognitive profiles. The framework described in this section is grounded primarily in domain-based assessment models such as the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS). WAIS separates cognitive functioning into distinct domains rather than treating intelligence as a single uniform capacity. This separation allo...\""
},
{
"logid": 118,
"ns": 0,
"title": "Why Generic Assessment Fails with Uneven Cognitive Profiles",
"pageid": 90,
"logpage": 90,
"revid": 375,
"params": {},
"type": "create",
"action": "create",
"user": "PeteTyerman",
"timestamp": "2026-02-10T10:27:47Z",
"comment": "Created page with \"== Why Generic Assessment Fails with Uneven Cognitive Profiles == This page explains why standard or \u201cgeneric\u201d assessment methods often produce invalid conclusions when cognitive abilities are unevenly distributed across domains. Generic assessment typically assumes that cognitive abilities are broadly uniform. Where this assumption does not hold, performance may be dominated by the most constrained domain rather than by the reasoning capacity being evaluated. ===...\""
},
{
"logid": 117,
"ns": 0,
"title": "Cognitive capacity, expression, and compensability",
"pageid": 89,
"logpage": 89,
"revid": 373,
"params": {},
"type": "create",
"action": "create",
"user": "PeteTyerman",
"timestamp": "2026-02-10T10:22:16Z",
"comment": "Created page with \" == Cognitive Capacity, Expression, and Compensability == This page explains the distinction between cognitive capacity and cognitive expression, and how this distinction becomes visible within structured domain-based assessment such as WAIS. Cognitive capacity refers to underlying reasoning ability \u2014 abstraction, conceptual integration, and problem-solving. Within WAIS, this is most strongly reflected in reasoning-dominant domains such as Verbal Comprehension (VCI) a...\""
},
{
"logid": 116,
"ns": 0,
"title": "WAIS Domain Structure and Internal Discrepancy",
"pageid": 88,
"logpage": 88,
"revid": 371,
"params": {},
"type": "create",
"action": "create",
"user": "PeteTyerman",
"timestamp": "2026-02-10T10:19:52Z",
"comment": "Created page with \" == WAIS Domain Structure and Internal Discrepancy == This page explains how the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) provides structured, standardised evidence of internal cognitive differences across distinct domains. WAIS does not measure a single, uniform intelligence. It separates cognitive functioning into multiple domains, including: Verbal Comprehension (VCI) Perceptual Reasoning (PRI) Working Memory (WMI) Processing Speed (PSI) Each domain is standardi...\""
},
{
"logid": 115,
"ns": 0,
"title": "Limits of cognitive adjustability",
"pageid": 87,
"logpage": 87,
"revid": 368,
"params": {},
"type": "create",
"action": "create",
"user": "PeteTyerman",
"timestamp": "2026-02-10T09:38:51Z",
"comment": "Created page with \" == Limits of Cognitive Adjustability == This page explains which aspects of cognition can be adjusted for and which represent intrinsic capacity, and why confusing the two leads to error. Adjustment can operate on how cognitive ability is accessed and expressed, but not on whether cognitive ability exists. This distinction is central to valid assessment. === Non-adjustable domains: core capacity === Certain cognitive domains reflect intrinsic reasoning ability, abstra...\""
},
{
"logid": 114,
"ns": 0,
"title": "Cognitive Capacity, Expression, and Compensability",
"pageid": 86,
"logpage": 86,
"revid": 364,
"params": {},
"type": "create",
"action": "create",
"user": "PeteTyerman",
"timestamp": "2026-02-03T12:02:20Z",
"comment": "Created page with \" == Cognitive Capacity, Expression, and Compensability == This page explains the distinction between cognitive capacity and cognitive expression, and why confusing the two leads to systematic misassessment where cognitive profiles are uneven. Cognitive capacity refers to underlying ability to reason, understand, analyse, and solve problems. Cognitive expression refers to the conditions under which that capacity can be accessed, demonstrated, or translated into observabl...\""
},
{
"logid": 113,
"ns": 0,
"title": "Uneven cognitive profiles explained",
"pageid": 85,
"logpage": 85,
"revid": 360,
"params": {},
"type": "create",
"action": "create",
"user": "PeteTyerman",
"timestamp": "2026-02-03T11:58:37Z",
"comment": "Created page with \"== Uneven Cognitive Profiles Explained == An uneven cognitive profile describes a pattern in which different cognitive abilities are distributed unevenly within the same individual. Some domains may be strong or exceptional, while others are significantly more constrained. This unevenness is common in neurodivergent conditions such as dyslexia and ADHD, and is frequently present in autism. Where assessment systems assume that cognitive abilities are broadly even, uneve...\""
}
]
}
}